Approved Senate 2014-2015.61 and Board of Governors 2015.60
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
The knowledge created through Research conducted by the University of Ottawa contributes to
the intellectual, social, health and economic fabric of society. Our communities and society trust
the integrity of our Researchers and have confidence in our institutional and individual
compliance with the regulations, policies, practices and ethical norms which govern Research.
The University of Ottawa recognizes its responsibility to provide an environment that supports
and promotes the responsible conduct of research.
1. The purpose of this Policy is to confirm the University of Ottawa’s continued commitment
to the highest standards of integrity in all aspects of Research, including seeking funding,
conducting Research and reporting the results.
APPLICATION AND SCOPE
2. Capitalized words and expressions used in this Policy have a corresponding meaning
attributed to them as set out in the Definitions at Section 28 of this Policy and Section 42
of Procedure 29-2.
3. This Policy applies to all Members of the University Community engaged in Research
under the University’s auspices or jurisdiction, regardless of the location of the Research.
4. This Policy does not replace, limit or supersede existing University of Ottawa collective
agreement provisions or academic regulations.
5. A faculty may develop and adopt additional policies or procedures which must, at a
minimum, meet and not conflict with the provisions of this Policy and of Procedure 29-2
The faculty council or the executive committee of the faculty shall be the depository of
such additional policies and procedures. The faculty shall inform the Office of Research
Ethics and Integrity of any such additional policies or procedures and shall ensure that
they are publicly accessible.
6. Principal Investigators and Researchers, whose Primary Appointment is at a hospital or
research institute affiliated with the University, shall be subject to the responsible
conduct of research policy of such hospital or institute, except as indicated below for
students. In the absence of such policy at the hospital or at the research institute, or if
the hospital or research institute does not meet the standards of this Policy and
Procedure 29-2, this Policy and Procedure 29-2 shall apply.
a) The Primary Appointment of students and Research Trainees working at a hospital
or hospital-based research institute and whose work is being conducted in fulfillment
of their academic programs such as thesis-related work shall be the University of
b) The Primary Appointment of students and Research Trainees working in an
employer-employee relationship at a hospital or hospital-based research institute to
perform work outside of their academic programs shall be the hospital or hospital-based
7. The University is committed to:
a) maintaining the highest standards of integrity in its research activities;
b) maintaining a research environment that promotes the responsible conduct of
research and academic freedom;
c) fulfilling its responsibilities in upholding applicable legislation for the conduct of
Research and the policies, rules, regulations and its contractual agreements with
Research Sponsors and with the Agencies
8. The University recognizes its responsibility for promoting awareness and importance of
responsible conduct of research.
9. The University has established minimum requirements for the responsible conduct of
research and procedures for addressing Allegations as set out in Procedure 29-2 established under this Policy.
10. It is a collective responsibility of all Members of the University Community to promote a
culture of high integrity standards in Research activities, to ensure responsible conduct
of research and to abide by Applicable Laws for the conduct of Research and Research
Sponsors’ Policies and/or Requirements.
11. Allegations of suspected Breaches of Responsible Conduct of Research, made in good
faith, are a necessary and valuable service and individuals are expected to report in
good faith any information pertaining to possible Breaches of Responsible Conduct of
Research and to participate, as appropriate, in the Inquiry and/or Investigation to
address such Allegations or Breaches.
12. The University provides and maintains a fair and timely process for reporting,
investigating and addressing Allegations and determines consequences through
collective agreement provisions or under Procedure 29-2 established under this Policy.
13. The University is committed to continuing its work with its affiliated hospitals and
research institutes to harmonize the procedures for investigating and addressing
14. The University will take appropriate preventative and corrective action, including
academic sanctions, when a Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research occurs and
will, where warranted, hold individuals responsible in accordance with applicable
collective agreement provisions, terms of employment or other University Policies and
15. A person may file or withdraw an Allegation pursuant to this Policy and its Procedure 29-2 without fear of reprisal or threat, except where paragraph 16 of this Policy applies.
16. Where the University has finally determined the Allegation is not made in good faith or is
made with malice, the University will take appropriate preventative and corrective action,
including academic sanctions, and will, where warranted, hold individuals responsible in
accordance with applicable collective agreement provisions, terms of employment or
other University Policies and Procedures.
17. Allegations will be treated in a confidential manner and in accordance with the provisions
of any applicable collective agreement and having regard to applicable privacy
18. All individuals involved in an Allegation and the process for addressing such an
Allegation must keep the matter confidential in order to safeguard individuals against
unsubstantiated Allegations, to protect the rights of those involved in the Allegation and
to preserve the integrity of the Inquiry and Investigation.
19. Throughout the process for addressing an Allegation, the Office of Research Ethics and
Integrity shall be responsible for:
a) ensuring that the process for addressing an Allegation set out in Procedure 29-2
is dealt with in a timely manner and in accordance with Procedure 29-2
b) providing reports on the status and outcome of Inquiries and Investigations into
an alleged Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research to the appropriate
bodies, including Research Sponsors, Agencies, the Secretariat on Responsible
Conduct of Research or to the University’s Research Ethics Boards, as may be
required, and having regard to confidentiality considerations and to applicable
privacy legislation; and
c) preparing public statistical annual reports on confirmed findings of Breaches of
Responsible Conduct of Research and action taken, subject to applicable privacy
20. The Office of the Vice-President, Research shall report to the Administrative Committee
on all activities related to the promotion and implementation of Policy 115 - Responsible
Conduct of Research and Procedure 29-2.
IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW
21. The Vice-President, Research, is responsible for the implementation and review of this
Policy and making recommendations for amendments to it for the final approval of the
Senate and the Board of Governors.
22. The University, through its Administrative Committee and Senate Executive Committee,
shall establish procedures relating to the implementation of this Policy including, without
limitation, Procedure 29-2: Addressing Allegations of a Breach of
Responsible Conduct of Research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
23. All parties involved in misconduct Allegations, Inquiries or Investigations shall reveal the
presence of any and all potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest. All parties
involved in misconduct Inquiries or Investigations will have no potential, perceived or
actual Conflicts of Interest
24. If the person who would normally run an Inquiry or Investigation is in a Conflict of
Interest, the Allegation should be addressed to the Director, Research Ethics and
Integrity, who will consult the Vice-President, Research (or Vice-President, Academic,
depending on the nature of the Allegation) so that a replacement can be chosen.
25. If the Allegation is made against the Director, Office of Research Ethics and Integrity or if
the Director, Research and Integrity is in a Conflict of Interest, the Vice-President,
Research will choose a replacement who will take on the duties of the Director, Office of
Research Ethics and Integrity for the case.
26. If the Allegation is made against the Vice-President, Research or if the Vice-President,
Research is in a Conflict of interest, a replacement will be chosen by the President.
27. If the Allegation is made against the President or if the President is in a Conflict of
Interest, the Director, Office of Research Ethics and Integrity, acting through the Vice-
President, Governance, will consult the Chair of the Board of Governors to determine an
appropriate course of action and process, consistent with the principles of this Policy.
28. For the purposes of this Policy and Procedure 29-2 established under this Policy, the
following words and expressions shall have the corresponding meaning as set out below
and in Section 42 of Procedure 29-2. For the most part these definitions are based on
the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research and do not replace or
supersede existing definitions contained in applicable University of Ottawa collective
Agency or Agencies: Refers to any one of the following or collectively as the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
of Canada (SSHRC).
Allegation: A declaration, statement, or assertion communicated in writing to the effect
that there has been, or continues to be, a Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research,
the validity of which has not been established.
Applicable Laws: An expression to encompass all of the laws, regulations, professional
or disciplinary standards or guidelines, relating to Research or to investigating or
addressing a Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research. Examples include the Tri-
Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research; 2nd edition of the Tri-Council
Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2); Canadian
Council on Animal Care Policies and Guidelines; Agency policies related to the Canadian
Environmental Assessment Act; Licenses for Research in the field; Laboratory Biosafety
Guidelines; Controlled Goods Program; Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)
Regulations; and Canada’s Food and Drugs Act; access to information and protection of
Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research: An expression used to encompass the
following non-exhaustive list, but which does not include honest error or honest
differences of opinion in the carrying out of Research or scholarly activity:
a) Fabrication: Making up data, source material, methodologies or findings,
including graphs and images.
b) Falsification: Manipulating, changing, or omitting data, source material,
methodologies or findings, including graphs and images, without acknowledgement and
which results in inaccurate findings or conclusions.
c) Destruction of research records: The destruction of one’s own or another’s
Research Data or records to specifically avoid the detection of wrongdoing or in
contravention of applicable funding agreements, University policies and/or laws,
regulations and professional or disciplinary standards.
d) Plagiarism: Presenting and using another’s published or unpublished work,
including theories, concepts, data, source material, methodologies or findings, including
graphs and images, as one’s own, without appropriate referencing and, if required,
e) Redundant publications: The re-publication of one’s own previously published
work or part thereof, or data, in the same or another language, without
adequate justification or acknowledgment of the source,
f) Invalid authorship: Inaccurate attribution of authorship, including attribution
of authorship to persons other than those who have contributed sufficiently to take
responsibility for the intellectual content, or agreeing to be listed as author to a
publication for which one made little or no material contribution.
g) Inadequate acknowledgement: Failure to appropriately recognize contributions
of others in a manner consistent with their respective contributions and authorship
policies of relevant publications.
h) Mismanagement of Conflict of Interest: Failure to appropriately manage
any real, potential or perceived Conflict of Interest, in accordance with the Institution’s
policy on Conflict of interest in research or with Research Sponsors’ Policies and/or
i) Misrepresentation in a funding application or related documents:
(i) Providing incomplete, inaccurate or false information in a grant or award
application or related document, such as a letter of support or a progress report,
including misrepresenting one's credentials, qualifications and/or research
(ii) Applying for and/or holding an NSERC, SSHRC or CIHR award when
deemed ineligible by NSERC, SSHRC, CIHR or any other research or research
funding organization world-wide for reasons of Breach of Responsible Conduct of
Research policies such as ethics, integrity or financial management policies.
(iii) Listing of co-applicants, collaborators or partners without their agreement.
j) Mismanagement of Grants or Award Funds: Using grant or award funds
for purposes inconsistent with the University or Research Sponsor policies;
misappropriating grants and award funds; contravening Research Sponsor financial
policies; or providing incomplete, inaccurate or false information on documentation for
expenditures from grant or award accounts.
k) Breaches of policy and regulatory requirements:
(i) Failing to meet University Policies or Procedures, Applicable Laws, or
Research Sponsors’ policies, rules, regulations, or contractual
agreements or to comply with relevant policies, laws or regulations
including, without limitation;
a. the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research;
b. 2nd edition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct of
Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2);
c. Canadian Council on Animal Care Policies and Guidelines;
d. Agency policies related to the Canadian Environmental Assessment
e. Licenses for research in the field;
f. Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines;
g. Controlled Goods Program;
h. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Regulations;
i. Canada’s Food and Drugs Act;
j. access to information and protection of privacy laws.
(ii) Failing to obtain appropriate approvals, permits or certifications before
conducting research activities.
Conflict of Interest: A Conflict of Interest may arise when activities or situations place
an individual in a real, potential or perceived conflict between the duties or
responsibilities related to research, and personal, institutional or other interests. These
interests include, but are not limited to, business, commercial or financial interests
pertaining to the individual, his/her family members, friends, or former, current or
prospective professional associates.
Inquiry: The process of reviewing an Allegation to determine 1) whether the
Allegation is responsible, 2) the particular policy or requirements of responsible conduct
of research that may have been breached, and 3) whether an Investigation is warranted
based on the information provided in the Allegation.
Investigation: A systematic process of examining an Allegation, collecting and
examining the evidence related to the Allegation, and making a decision as to whether a
Breach of Responsible Conduct of Research has occurred.
Member(s) of the University Community: An expression to encompass all University
individuals that may be engaged in Research, including but not limited to:
a) employees, including all unionized and non-unionized academic and
administrative staff as well as those whose salary is paid through sources other than the
University’s operating funds, such as grants, research grants and external contracts;
b) students, meaning individuals registered at the University, whether full time or
part time and including special students, at the undergraduate or graduate level;
c) clinicians and physicians with an academic appointment, adjunct and emeritus
professors, post-doctoral or clinical fellows, Research Trainees, medical residents,
visitors, including visiting students and volunteers.
Primary Appointment: The lead institution (University or affiliated research hospital)
responsible for the appointment and personnel costs of the Principal Investigator or
Researcher. For undergraduate and graduate students whose work is being conducted
in fulfillment of their academic programs such as thesis-related work, the Primary
Appointment shall be at the University of Ottawa.
Principal Investigator: The person who has ultimate responsibility for a research
project. In the case of a project funded by an external or internal grant or contract, the
Principal Investigator is the holder of the grant or contract. In the case of a project that is
not funded, the Principal Investigator is the initiator of the Research project. The
Principal Investigator is usually the supervisor of the Research Team and is usually a
Research: An undertaking intended to extend knowledge through a disciplined
inquiry or systematic investigation.
Research Sponsor: The funding agency, foundation, organization or individual, or other
entity, public or private, international, national, provincial or foreign, providing funding to
the University and Member of the University community for Research.
Research Sponsors’ Policies and/or Requirements: An expression to encompass all
of the policies, rules, directives, guidelines, regulations, processes, funding agreements
with the University and contractual requirements established by Research Sponsors or
Agencies, related to applying for and managing research funds, performing Research,
disseminating Research results and the investigation of an Allegation. Examples of such
policies and requirements include the 2ndedition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical
Conduct of Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2), The Tri-Agency Framework:
Responsible Conduct of Research and the Agreement on the Administration of Agency
Grants and Awards by Research Institutions.
Research Trainee: Any undergraduate or graduate student, post-doctoral fellow or
clinical fellow engaged in a research project, including visiting students and fellows.
Researcher: Anyone who conducts research activities.
Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research (or “SRCR”): The body responsible
for providing substantive and administrative support for the Agencies with respect to the
Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 2nd
edition (TCPS 2), and the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
University Policies and Procedures: An expression to encompass the University’s
administrative policies and administrative procedures and academic regulations.
• Tri-Council Agreement on the Administration of Agency Grants and Awards by Research
• Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research (2011)
• Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for Research Involving Humans, second
University of Ottawa documents
• Policy 29: Invention and Technology Transfer
• Policy 31: Animals Used in Research and Teaching at the University Of Ottawa
• Policy 48: Grants and Contracts Administered by the University
• Policy 70: Conflict of Interest - Members of Staff
• Policy 92: Financial Fraud
• Academic Regulations: Regulation 14 Academic fraud
• APUO collective agreement
o Article 10: Professional ethics
o Article 39: Disciplinary Measures
• APTPUO Collective Agreement
o Article 2.6 Ethical Behaviour
o Article 6: Discipline and Discharge
• The United States Public Health Service (PHS) regulation, "Public Health Service
Policies on Research Misconduct,":42 CFR 93
Created on June 22, 2015
(Office of the Vice-President, Research)