Patrick Dumberry

1. Article 10, in: Patricia Galvao Teles & Pierre Bodeau-Livinec (eds), Article-by-Article Commentary of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility (à paraître 2025).
2. The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept, in: P. Merkouris, A. Kulick, J.M. Álvarez-Zarate, M. Żenkiewicz (eds), Custom and its Interpretation in International Investment Law, Cambridge UP, 2024, 3-22. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/custom-and-its-interpretation-in-international-investment-law/3A886D54D5D03187CF8103559DDC9565
3. Article 38 ICJ Statute: Sources (and Select General Principles of Law), in: Andreas Kulick & Michael Waibel (eds), General International Law in International Investment Law: A Commentary, Oxford Commentaries on International Law Series, 2024, 464-488. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/general-international-law-in-international-investment-law-9780192849922?cc=ca&lang=en&
4. State Responsibility of New States for Wrongful Acts Committed by Rebels in the Context of Civil Wars: Does the Rule Apply to Cases Other than Secession?, in: Jorge Viñuales, Andrew Clapham, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes & Mamadou Hébié (eds), The International Legal Order in the XXIst Century; Essays in Honour of Professor Marcelo Gustavo Kohen, Brill, 2023, 556–570. https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/61788
5. The secession Question in Quebec, in: Jure Vidmar, Sarah McGibbon & Lea Raible (eds), Research Handbook on Secession, Elgar Publ., 2022, 148-166. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/research-handbook-on-secession-9781788971744.html
6. The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept, in: Luca Pasquet, Klara Polackova Van der Ploeg & Léon Castellanos Jankiewicz (eds),International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques: Proceedings of the Conference ‘International Law and Time’, Springer, 2022, 381-404. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-09465-1
7. Article 8.10: Treatment of Investors and of Covered Investments, in: Marc Bungenberg & August Reinisch ‎(eds), CETA Investment Law: Article-by-Article Commentary, Nomos/Hart, 2021, 249-269. https://www.bloomsbury.com/ca/ceta-investment-law-9781509934676/
8. An Overview of State Succession Issues arising as a Result of an Armed Conflict, in: Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis & Catharine Titi (eds) International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, Springer, European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Special Issue, 2019, 93-112. https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/international-investment-law-and-the-law-of-armed-conflict/17039940
9. Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), in: Anthony Vanduzer & Patrick Leblond (eds), Promoting and Managing International Investment: Towards an Integrated Policy, Routledge, 2020, 223-246 (avec Anthony Vanduzer). https://www.routledge.com/Promoting-and-Managing-International-Investment-Towards-an-Integrated-Policy-Approach/VanDuzer-Leblond/p/book/9781032238340?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwqf20BhBwEiwAt7dtdd7e-8-sO0H6oEZgeHmofxXfXGunenj6M45vMkWysIbmyz7Por9XkxoCgcgQAvD_BwE
10. Fair and Equitable Treatment, in: Stefanie Schacherer & Makane Moïse Mbengue ‎(eds), Foreign Investment under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), Springer, 2018, 95-126. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-98361-5
11. Moral Damages, in: Christina Beharry (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration, Brill, 2018, 142-167. https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/35978
12. Customary International Law, in: Krista Nadakavukaren Schefer & Thomas Cottier (eds), Encyclopedia of International Economic Law, Elgar Publ., 2018. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/elgar-encyclopedia-of-international-economic-law-9781784713539.html
13. A Few Pragmatic Observations on How BITs should be Modified to Incorporate Human Rights Obligations, in: Kavaljit Singh & Burghard Ilge (eds), The Changing Landscape of International Investment Agreements: A Critical Assessment, Madhyam & Both Ends, 2016. https://www.bothends.org/en/Whats-new/Publicaties/Book-Rethinking-Bilateral-Investment-Treaties-Critical-Issues-and-Policy-Choices/
14. La succession d'États en matière de responsabilité internationale et ses liens avec la responsabilité des États en matière de traités, in: G. Distefano, G. Gaggioli & A. Hêche (eds), La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d'État en matière de traités : Commentaire article par article et études thématiques, Bruylant, 2015; 1581-1608. https://www.larcier-intersentia.com/fr/convention-vienne-1978-succession-etats-matiere-traites-9782802746263.html
15. Drafting the Fair and Equitable Treatment Clause in the TPP and RCEP: Lessons Learned from the NAFTA Article 1105 Experience, in: Wenhua Shan & Mark Feldman (eds), Transnational Dispute Management Special Issue: The Pacific Rim and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Risks of the Pacific Century, TDM, 2015. https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2189
16. Moral Damages, in: M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel, S. Hobe & A. Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law: A Handbook, Hart Publ, 2015; 130-141. https://www.bloomsbury.com/ca/international-investment-law-9781849463638/
17. A Few Pragmatic Observations on How BITs should be Modified to Incorporate Human Rights Obligations, in: Jean E. Kalicki & Anna Joubin-Bret (eds), Transnational Dispute Management Special Issue: Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of A Roadmap, TDM, 2014 (avec G. Dumas-Aubin). https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2059
18. The Doctrine of “Clean Hands” and the Inadmissibility of Claims by Investors Breaching International Human Rights Law, in: Ursula Kriebaum (ed), Transnational Dispute Management Special Issue: Aligning Human Rights and Investment Protection, TDM, 2013 (avec G. Dumas-Aubin). https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1933
19. International Investment Contracts, in: T. Gazzini & E. de Brabandere (eds), International Investment Law. The Sources of Rights and Obligations. Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 2012, 215-243.  https://brill.com/display/title/20679
20. Corporate Investors’ International Legal Personality and their Accountability for Human Rights Violations under Investment Treaties, in: A. De Mestral & C. Lévesque (eds), Improving International Investment Agreements Negotiation, Substantive Obligations and Dispute Resolution, Routledge, 2012; 179-194.  https://www.routledge.com/Improving-International-Investment-Agreements/DeMestral-Levesque/p/book/9781138843387
21. Non-State Actors in International Investment Law: The Legal Personality of Corporations and NGOs in the Context of Investor-State Arbitration, in: Jean d'Aspremont (ed), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiples Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law, Routledge-Cavendish, 2011; 360-371 (avec E. Labelle Eastaugh). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203816837/participants-international-legal-system-jean-aspremont
22. Canada’s Accession to the ICSID Convention and the 2006 Canada-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty: New Protections and Opportunities for Investors, in: Carlos Alberto Soto Coaguila (ed) El Arbitraje En El Perú Y El Mundo, Lima, “Arbitraje Comercial y Arbitraje de Inversión” series, 2008; 851-866 (avec S.L. Drymer). https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/DF213BA8393A81A705257D07006AEA87/$FILE/EL_ARBITRAJE_EN_EL_PERU_Y_EL_MUNDO.pdf (PDF; 3.43 Mo)
23. Lessons Learned from the Quebec Secession Reference before the Supreme Court of Canada, in: Marcelo G. Kohen (ed) Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006; 416-452. https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/law/public-international-law/secession-international-law-perspectives?format=HB&isbn=9780521849289 

1. Treaties, Territorial Application, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (2026), à paraître. 
2. Book Review, A. Sarvarian, The Law of State Succession: Principles and Practice, Oxford UP 2025, German Yearbook of International Law (2025), à paraître. 
3. FET Clauses Referring to ‘International Law’: An Empirical Study of How Tribunals Interpret their Relationship with the Minimum Standard and how it Impacts Their Findings on Liability, Revue de prévention et règlement des différends (2026), à paraître. 
4. Recognition of Governments and Matters of Representation before Investor-State Arbitration Tribunals: Lessons Learned from the Cases Involving Venezuela, Journal of International Arbitration (2026) 43(2), 295-318 https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2026012
5.  Investment Arbitration Awards Dealing with Recognition in the Libyan Civil War, American Journal of International Law Unbound (2025) 119, 296-300 https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2025.10041
6. The Doctrine of Clean Hands, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, online ed., 2025. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e18?rskey=MV65I5&result=1&prd=MPIL
7. Book review, N. Pavlopoulos, The Identity of Governments in International Law, Oxford UP, 2024’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law (2025)
8. Deripaska v Montenegro: The Alpha and Omega of State Succession to BITs, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2025), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf017
9. A Critical Analysis of the Work of the ILC on ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’: A Missed Opportunity, Leiden Journal of International Law (2025) 38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/critical-analysis-of-the-work-of-the-ilc-on-state-succession-in-matters-of-state-responsibility-a-missed-opportunity/184B7BF6A29154C303ADD244C5D8247C
10. NAFTA’s FET Clause is (Practically) Dead! Long Live its Legacy!: An Empirical Survey of how Tribunals have interpreted FET Clauses Linked to the Minimum Standard, European Investment Law and Arbitration Review (2024), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.54648/eila2024042.
11. Words Matters After All! An Empirical Survey of How Tribunals Interpret Differently Three Types of FET Clauses and the Way it Impacts their Findings on Liability, TDM(2024). Words Matters After All! An Empirical Survey of How Tribunals Interpret Differently Three Types of FET Clauses and the Way it Impacts their Findings on Liability - Advance publication - Journal | TDM Journal (transnational-dispute-management.com)
12. An Empirical Study of How Tribunals Interpret Stand-Alone FET Clauses Regarding their Relationship with the MST and How it Impacts Findings on Liability, Journal of International Arbitration (2024), 41(4); 439-460. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/41.1/JOIA2024019
13. New Developments in the Interpretation and Application of the Clean Hands Doctrine by Investment Tribunals, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2023); 14(4); 504-516. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/14/4/504/7442011
14. ‘Cross Treaty Interpretation’ en Bloc or How CAFTA Tribunals Are Systematically Interpreting the FET Standard Based NAFTA Case Law, Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2023) 22(2); 384–418. https://brill.com/view/journals/lape/22/2/article-p384_7.xml
15. Risky Business: What Happen to Contracts Signed by Foreign Investors with Rebels During a Civil War Once the Conflict Ends?, Journal of International Arbitration (2022) 39(4); 1-39. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/39.4/JOIA2022024
16. State Succession and State Responsibility in the context of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal  (special issue for the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for  Internationally Wrongful Acts) (2022) 37(1-2); 85-100 (avec M. Kohen). https://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/article-abstract/37/1-2/85/6515399
17. State Responsibility of New States regarding Acts Committed by Rebels During a Successful Civil War: How does the Rule Apply to Different Types of State Succession?, McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution (2022) 7(7); 183-196. https://mjdr-rrdm.ca/articles/volume-7/state-responsibility-of-new-states-regarding-acts-committed-by-rebels-during-a-successful-civil-war/
18. State Responsibility for the Conduct of Rebels in Situations of Unsuccessful Civil Wars: A Critical Analysis of the Cengiz v. Libya Case, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2022), 13(1); 153-165. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/13/1/153/6425016
19. Why are Wrongful Acts Committed by Rebels during a Civil War Attributable to the State when they are Successful? A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, European Investment Law and Arbitration Review (2021) 6; 189-213.https://brill.com/view/journals/eilo/6/1/article-p189_9.xml
20. State Responsibility and Rebels: an Analysis of the Strabag Award in the Context of Libya’s Civil War, TDM (2021). https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2930
21. Host States’ Due Diligence Obligation Towards Foreign Investors in the Context of Rebellion and Civil Wars, Journal of World Investments and Trade (2021), 22; 705-731. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/22/5-6/article-p705_4.xml
22. The Clean Hands Doctrine as a General Principle of International Law, Journal of World Investments and Trade (2020) 21(4); 489–527. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/21/4/article-p489_1.xml
23. The Emergence of the Concept of ‘General Principle of International Law’ in Investment Arbitration Case Law, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2020) 11(2); 194–216. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/11/2/194/5732855?redirectedFrom=fulltext
24. Terra incognita: What Happens when a Problem of State Succession Occurs during Arbitration Proceedings?, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2018) 17; 348-371. https://brill.com/view/journals/lape/17/2/article-p350_5.xml
25. State Succession to Multilateral Investment Treaties and the ICSID Convention, European Investment Law and Arbitration Review (2018) 3; 3-19 https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Investment+Law+and+Arbitration+Review/3.1/EILA2018002
26. State Succession to BITs: Analysis of Case Law in the Context of Dissolution and Secession, Arbitration International (2018) 34(1); 445–462. https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/article-abstract/34/3/445/5104441?redirectedFrom=fulltext
27. Requiem for Crimea: Why Tribunals should have Declined Jurisdiction over the Claims of Ukrainian Investors against Russian under the Ukraine-Russia BIT, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2018) 9(3); 506–533. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/9/3/506/5032472
28. State Succession to State Contracts: A New Framework of Analysis for an Unexplored Question, Journal of World Investments and Trade(2018) 19; 1-32. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/19/4/article-p595_1.xml
29. State Succession to BITs in the Context of the Transfer of Territory of Macao to China: Lessons learned from the Sanum Saga, Journal of International Arbitration (2018) 35(1); 329-356. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/35.3/JOIA2018018
30. The Importation of ‘Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Protection Through MFN Clauses: An analysis of NAFTA Article 1103, TDM (2017) 14(1); 1-16. https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2439
31. Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard become a Rule of Customary international Law?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2017) 8(1); 155-178. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/8/1/155/2453210
32. Statements as Evidence of State Practice for Custom Creation in International Investment Law, World Arbitration and Mediation Review (2016) 10(1); 1-39. https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/statements-evidence-state-practice-custom-creation-international-investment-law-wamr-2016
33. Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of MFN Clauses to Get ‘Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection, Arbitration International (2016); 1-16. https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/article-abstract/33/1/1/2638481
34. A Few Observations on the Remaining Fundamental Importance of Customary Rules in the Age of Treatification of International Investment Law, Association Suisse de l’Arbitrage (ASA) Bulletin (2016) 34(1); 41-61. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/ASA+Bulletin/34.1/ASAB2016004
35. State of Confusion: The Doctrine of “Clean Hands” In Investment Arbitration after the Yukos Award, Journal of World Investments and Trade (2016) 17; 229-259. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/17/2/article-p229_2.xml
36. The Importation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal (2016); 229-259. https://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/article-abstract/32/1/116/2670287
37. The Role and Relevance of Awards in the Formation, Identification and Evolution of Customary Rules in International Investment Law, Journal of International Arbitration (2016) 33(3). https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/33.3/JOIA2016015
38. The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws, McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution (2015-2016) 2; 66-81. https://mjdr-rrdm.ca/articles/v2/the-practice-of-states-as-evidence-of-custom-an-analysis-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-standard-clauses-in-states-foreign-investment-laws/
39. The Question of Secession in Quebec, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo (2015) 17(2), 257-380. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17394/80790
40. An Uncharted Question of State Succession: Are New States Automatically Bound by the BITs Concluded by Predecessor States Before Independence?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2015) 6; 74-96. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/6/1/74/804789
41. State Succession to Bilateral Treaties: A Few Observations on the Incoherent and Unjustifiable Solution Adopted for Secession and Dissolution of States under the 1978 Vienna Convention, Leiden Journal of International Law (2015) 28; 13-31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/state-succession-to-bilateral-treaties-a-few-observations-on-the-incoherent-and-unjustifiable-solution-adopted-for-secession-and-dissolution-of-states-under-the-1978-vienna-convention/1A96E4F0D9B1CCE4B5DBB13925FD5859
42. Wrong Direction: “Exceptional Circumstances” and Moral Damages in International Investment Arbitration, Journal of Damages in International Arbitration (2014) 1(2) (avec S. Cusson). https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/wrong-direction-exceptional-circumstances-and-moral-damages-international-investment
43. Moving the Goal Post! How Some NAFTA Tribunals have Challenged the FTC Note of Interpretation on the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105, World Arbitration and Mediation Review (2014) 8(2). https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/moving-goal-post-how-some-nafta-tribunals-have-challenged-ftc-note-interpretation-fair-and
44. Denial of Justice under NAFTA Article 1105: A Review of 20 Years of Case Law, Association Suisse de l’Arbitrage (ASA) Bulletin (2014) 32(2); 145-163. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/ASA+Bulletin/32.2/ASAB2014025
45. The Prohibition Against Arbitrary Conduct and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105, Journal of World Investment & Trade (2014) 15; 117-151. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/15/1-2/article-p117_4.xml
46. The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105, Journal of International Arbitration (2014) 31(1); 47-74.  https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/31.1/JOIA2014003
47. The Consequences of Turkey being the ‘Continuing’ State of the Ottoman Empire in Terms of International Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts, International Criminal Law Review (2014) 14(2); 261-273. https://brill.com/view/journals/icla/14/2/article-p261_4.xml
48. Unilateral Secession in a Multipolar World, Remarks by P. Dumberry, Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (2013) 107; 211-224. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-asil-annual-meeting/article/abs/remarks-by-patrick-dumberry/1F5483E526C10CE417E0B1CC4BAF37BB
49. Responsibility for Crimes Committed by the Ottoman Empire against the Armenian Population: Are the Rules of State Succession to International Responsibility of any Use?, Hague Yearbook of International Law (2013) 26; 141-167. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004287365/B9789004287365-s007.xml
50. State Succession With Respect to Multilateral Treaties in the Context of Secession: From the Principle of Tabula Rasa to the Emergence of a Presumption of Continuity of Treaties, Baltic Yearbook of International Law (2013) 13; 27-65 (avec D. Turp). https://brill.com/view/journals/byio/13/1/article-p27_3.xml
51. International Law, Whether You Like It or Not: An Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal Practice Regarding the Applicable Law in Deciding State Contracts Disputes under the ICSID Convention in the Twenty First Century, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy (2012-2013) 5; 477-516 (avec J. Stone). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327289138_International_Law_Whether_You_Like_It_or_Not_An_Analysis_of_Arbitral _Tribunal_Practice_Regarding_the_Applicable_Law_in_Deciding_State_Contracts_Disputes_under_the_ICSID_Convention_in_the_Twenty_First_
52. The Meaning of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105 in Light of the General Rules of Treaty Interpretation, International Arbitration Law Review (2013) 5; 121-134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327289089_The_Meaning_of_the_Fair_and_Equitable_Treatment_Standard_under_NAFTA _Article_1105_in_Light_of_the_General_Rules_of_Treaty_Interpretation_International_Arbitration_Law_Review_2013_5_121-134
53. Is Turkey the “Continuing” State of the Ottoman Empire under International Law? Netherlands International Law Review (2012) 59(2) ; 235-262. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1017/S0165070X12000162
54. How to Impose Human Rights Obligations on Corporations under Investment Treaties?, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy (2011-2012) 4; 569-600 (avec G. Dumas-Aubin). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327289085_How_to_Impose_Human_Rights_Obligations_on_Corporations_under_Investment _Treaties_Yearbook_on_International_Investment_Law_and_Policy_2011-2012_4_569-600
55. Turkey’s International Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts Committed by the Ottoman Empire, Revue générale de droit (2012) 42; 562-589. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rgd/2012-v42-n2-rgd01542/1026907ar/
56. When and How Allegations of Human Rights Violations can be Raised in Investor-State Arbitration, Journal of World Investment & Trade (2012) 13(3) ; 349-372 (avec G. Dumas-Aubin). https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/13/3/article-p349_2.xml
57. Satisfaction as a Form of Reparation for Moral Damages suffered by Investors and Respondent States in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes, Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2012) 3(1) ; 205-242. https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/3/1/205/844348
58. Developments in the Legal Standing of Shareholders and Holding Corporations in Investor-State Disputes, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal (2011) 26(1) ; 34-75 (avec M. Valasek). https://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/article-abstract/26/1/34/664466
59. Are BITs Representing the “New” Customary International Law in International Investment Law?, Penn State International Law Review (2010) 28(4) ; 675-701. https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1233&context=psilr
60. Incoherent and Ineffective: The Concept of Persistent Objector Revisited, International and Comparative Law Quarterly(2010) 59; 779-802. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/incoherent-and-ineffective-the-concept-of-persistent-objector-revisited/1D462AB671D1520E2355A1E407064BC9
61. Compensation for Moral Damages in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes, Journal of International Arbitration (2010) 27(3); 247-276. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/27.3/JOIA2010014
62. The Last Citadel! Can a State Claim the Status of “Persistent Objector” to Prevent the Application of a Rule of Customary International Law in Investor-State Arbitration?, Leiden Journal of International Law (2010) 23(2); 379-400. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/last-citadel-can-a-state-claim-the-status-of-persistent-objector-to-prevent-the-application-of-a-rule-of-customary-international-law-in-investorstate-arbitration/8A411DAD1FD921625103511D3B42EBB0
63. The Legal Standing of Shareholders before Arbitral Tribunals: Has Any Rule Of Customary International Law Crystallised?, Michigan State Journal of International Law (2010) 18(3); 353-374. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1665060#
64. Obsolete and Unjust: the Rule of Continuous Nationality in the Context of State Succession, Nordic Journal of International Law (2007) 76(2); 153-183. https://brill.com/view/journals/nord/76/2-3/article-p153_2.xml
65. The Use of the Concept of Unjust Enrichment to Resolve Issues of State Succession to International Responsibility, Revue belge de droit international (2006) 39(2); 506-528. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292129
66. The Controversial Issue of State Succession to International Responsibility in Light of Recent State Practice, German Yearbook of International Law (2006) 49; 413-448.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292125
67. New State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts by an Insurrectional Movement, European Journal of International Law (2006) 17(3); 605-621. https://www.uottawa.ca/faculte-droit/sites/g/files/bhrskd406/files/2025-08/205.pdf (143.11 Ko)
68. Is a New State Responsible for Obligations arising from Internationally Wrongful Acts Committed before its Independence in the Context of Secession?, Canadian Yearbook of International Law (2005) 43; 419-453.  https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-yearbook-of-international-law-annuaire-canadien-de-droit-international/article/abs/is-a-new-state-responsible-for-obligations-arising-from-internationally-wrongful-acts-committed-before-its-independence-in-the-context-of-secession/AE31D2F6C8E94D7DAF67DE0AA08C04E6
69. L'entreprise, sujet de droit international? Retour sur la question à la lumière des développements récents du droit international des investissements, Revue générale de droit international public (2004) 108(1); 103-122. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1285140
70. La succession d'États en matière de traités et le cas de la sécession: du principe de la table rase à l'émergence d'une présomption de continuité des traités, Revue Belge de droit international (2003) 36(2); 377-412 (avec D. Turp). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1291547
71. The Hawaiian Kingdom Arbitration Case and the Unsettled Question of the Hawaiian Kingdom's Claim to Continuity as an Independent State Under International Law, Chinese Journal of International Law (2002) 1; 655-684. https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article-abstract/1/2/655/299911
72. The Quest to Define ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ for Investors under International Law: The Case of the NAFTA Chapter 11 Pope & Talbot Awards, Journal of World Investment (2002) 3(4); 657-691. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288807
73. Fair and Equitable Treatment for Investors under International Law: An Overview of the Recent NAFTA Chapter 11 Pope & Talbot Awards, Bull. ASA (2002) 20(3); 453-466.
74. The NAFTA Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism and the Admissibility of Amicus Curiae Briefs by NGOs, Revista Estudios Socio-Juridicos (2002) 4(1); 58-79. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-05792002000100003
75. Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11 Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Some Comments on the Latest Case Law, International Arbitration Law Review (2001) 4(3); 96-104. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288825
76. The Admissibility of Amicus Curiae Briefs by NGOs in Investor-States Arbitration: The Precedent set by the Methanex Case in the Context of NAFTA Chapter 11 Proceedings, Non-State Actors and International Law (2001) 1(3); 201-214.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288792
77. The NAFTA Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Review of the Latest Case Law, Journal of World Investment (2001) 2(1); 151-195.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288774
78. The Admissibility of Amicus Curiae Briefs in NAFTA Chapter 11 Proceedings: Some Remarks on the Methanex Case, A Precedent Likely to Be Followed by Other NAFTA Arbitral Tribunals, Bull. ASA (2001) 19(1); 74-85.
79. Le recours en interprétation des arrêts de la Cour internationale de Justice et des sentences arbitrales, Revue québécoise de droit international (2000) 13(2); 201-236. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1288739

1. The Deripaska v Montenegro case, conference on State Succession and ISDS, University of Vienna, Austria, 22 September 2025: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/state-succession-and-isds-tickets-1622437416989
2. State Succession Issues Arising in the Context of International Investment Law in Post-conflict Situations, Boğaziçi University International Law Conference: ‘Justice and Reconstruction in Post-Conflict Societies’, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Türkiye, 5-6 July 2025. https://bilc.bogazici.edu.tr/bilc-2025
3. Fair and Equitable Treatment, Webinar, International Economic Law Clinic National University of Singapore, 12 February 2025.
4. Navigating State Succession in a Changing International Landscape, Workshop, European Academic Forum of the Jean Monnet Chair, Faculty of Law, New University, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 3 December 2024. https://www.nova-uni.si/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/EAF_31_vabilo-1.pdf (PDF; 230.95 ko)
5. State Succession in International Investment Law, présentation à la conférence Territory in International Investment Law, Fortieth ITF Public Conference, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Londres, Royaume-uni, 10 nov. 2023. https://www.biicl.org/events/11777/fortieth-itf-public-conference-territory-in-international-investment-law
6. The Cost of Inaction: Arbitral Practice in Respect of Earlier Generation FET Clauses and Current Approaches to FET Clauses, présentation aux États membres (et autres États invités), OCDE, Track 2 of the Work Programme on the Future of Investment Treaties, Paris, France, 7 nov. 2023. https://web-archive.oecd.org/temp/2024-05-06/614572-investment-treaties.htm
7. The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept, Interpreting the Unwritten Word: Custom & its Interpretation in International Investment Law, American University, Washington (US), 20-21 septembre 2023. https://www.american.edu/wcl/impact/initiatives-programs/arbitration/events1/interpreting-the-unwritten-word-custom-and-its-interpretation-in-international-investment-law.cfm
8. Customary International Law, Workshop for the Commentary on General International Law in International Investment Law, organisée par A. Kulick & M. Weibel, Vienne (Autriche), 28-29 avril 2022.
9. Conférence sur le livre ‘The Institute of International Law's Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge UP, 2019’ (avec Marcelo Kohen), Graduate Institute of International Studies, Genève, Suisse, 9 mai 2019.
10. An Overview of State Succession Issues arising as a Result of an Armed Conflict, International Investment Law & the Law of Armed Conflict, National and Kapodistrian University, Athènes, 5-6 octobre 2017. https://www.athenspil.law.uoa.gr/conferences/conferences_archive/colloquium_on_international_investment_law_the_law_of_armed_conflict/
11. The ‘Minimum Standard of Treatment’ in International Investment Law: The Fascinating Story of the Emergence, the Decline and the Recent Resurrection of a Concept, International Law and Time, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Genève, Suisse, 12-13 juin 2015.
12. Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), Workshop Investment Policy and Promotion: Law, Economics and Policy, University of Ottawa et World Trade Institute, Ottawa, 30 avril 1^er mai 2015.
13. State Responsibility for Genocide: Addressing the Preliminary Question of State Identity: The Case of Turkey and the Empire Ottoman, Global Forum “Against the Crime of Genocide” (panel 2: ‘The Issue of Accountability, and Elimination of the Consequences of Genocide’), Genocide Centenary Commission of Armenia, Erevan, Armenia, 22-23 avril 2015.
14. Investor-State Arbitration and Human Rights, International Right to Health Framework conference, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, New Delhi, Inde, juillet 2014.
15. Between Precedent and Analogy in International Litigation, Contemporary Actors and their Actions: A New Look at the Formation of International Law, Canadian Council of International Law, Ottawa, 15 novembre 2013.
16. Unilateral Secession in a Multipolar World, International Law in a Multipolar World, American Society of International Law, Washington, 5 avril 2013.
17. The Consequences of Turkey being the 'Continuing' State of the Ottoman Empire in terms of International Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts, The Armenian  Genocide : from Recognition to Compensation, Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia, Beyrouth, liban, 24-26 février 2012.
18. Legal Aspects of State Succession, 1^st Catalonia's Self Determination Conference: Building a New State, Association Sobirania i Justicia, Barcelone, Espagne, 3 novembre 2011.
19. International Investment Contracts, The Sources of Rights and Obligations in Transnational Investment Law, Leiden, Pays-Bas, 16 juin 2011.

Rapports

1. L’accession du Québec à la souveraineté et la succession d’États en matière de traités, in: Gouvernement du Québec, Mises à jour des études originalement préparées pour la Commission parlementaire d’étude des questions afférentes à l’accession du Québec à la souveraineté (1991-1992), Vol. 3 (1st Part) (Book 2), May 2002, 225-368 (avec  D. Turp). https://www.sqrc.gouv.qc.ca/documents/institutions-constitution/commision-souverainete-1991-1992/23-DanielTurp.pdf (PDF; 743.2 ko)
2. The Cost of Inaction: Arbitral Practice in Respect of Earlier Generation FET Clauses and Current Approaches to FET Clauses, OECD, Track 2 of the Work Programme on the Future of Investment Treaties, Report Summary of Findings, 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4872672

Blogs

1. The Eco Oro and Red Eagle Awards: Recent Divergence on how to Interpret FET Clauses Linked to the MST, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 26 July 2024. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2024/07/23/the-eco-oro-and-red-eagle-awards-recent-divergence-on-how-to-interpret-fair-and-equitable-treatment-clauses-linked-to-the-minimum-standard-of-treatment/
2. Dazed and Confused: The Cengiz v. Libya Award on State Responsibility for Conduct of Rebels in Situations of Civil Wars, Kluwer Arbitration Blog,December 2021. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/12/26/dazed-and-confused-the-cengiz-v-libya-award-on-state-responsibility-for-conduct-of-rebels-in-situations-of-civil-wars/
3. The Emergence of a Consistent Case Law: How NAFTA Tribunals have Interpreted the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard, Kluwer Arbitration Blog,October 2012. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2013/10/30/the-emergence-of-a-consistent-case-law-how-nafta-tribunals-have-interpreted-the-fair-and-equitable-treatment-standard/
4. Why and How Arbitral Tribunals Award Compensation for Moral Damages?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, May 2010. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2010/05/03/why-and-how-arbitral-tribunals-award-compensation-for-moral-damages/
5. How to Remediate Moral Damages Suffered by a State?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Dec. 2009. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2009/12/03/how-to-remediate-moral-damages-suffered-by-a-state/
6. Are BITs Representing the ‘New’ Customary International Law in International Investment Law?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Sept. 2009. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2009/09/02/are-bits-representing-the-new-customary-international-law-in-international-investment-law/
7. Can a State Claim the Status of ‘Persistent Objector’ in Investor-State Arbitration?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, July 2009. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2009/07/13/can-a-state-claim-the-status-of-persistent-objector-in-investor-state-arbitration/