Once a report is submitted through the reporting form, the incident is investigated.
This process allows the Faculty and departmental leadership to address each unique case in a professional and respectful manner. The confidentiality of all parties involved is protected according to the policies of the appropriate governing body. Anyone who retaliates or takes reprisals against the reporter will face serious consequences.
Report submitted
A report is submitted through the online reporting form. The reporter can choose to submit the report anonymously or provide their name, which will allow the investigating team to follow up with them and gather more information. Whether or not the reporter chooses to remain anonymous, all information submitted will remain confidential, in line with uOttawa polices and procedures.
Vice-dean notified
The vice-dean and delegates of the academic unit (e.g., UGME, PGME, Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, PharmD, Faculty Affairs) for the reporter and the subject of the report (respondent) are notified a report has been submitted.
The vice-dean and delegates automatically receive a copy of the report for review.
Reporter contacted
The vice-dean (or delegate) of the relevant academic unit contacts the reporter to discuss the incident. All discussions are documented.
The reporter is offered wellness support.
If the reporter chose to remain anonymous, they can’t be contacted.
Whether or not the reporter submitted the report anonymously, all information remains confidential.
Respondent and witnesses interviewed
The respondent is interviewed, along with any witnesses named in the report (if required).
The respondent is offered wellness support.
Decision made
After all parties have been interviewed, a decision is made on how to address the concern. Incidents of mistreatment or unprofessionalism are categorized based on the severity of the allegations. Where circumstances permit, a staged approach is used to correct the behaviour and prevent recurrence.
In the Faculty of Medicine, the following adapted Vanderbilt approach is used:
- Informal “cup of coffee” conversations: Minor allegations of unprofessional behaviour are managed with informal chats, typically without any need for formal documentation.
- Level 1 — awareness interventions: A single low-severity incident of inappropriate behaviour is addressed through confidential discussions between the respondent and someone with supervisory responsibilities (e.g., program director, site supervisor). This is a non-punitive awareness intervention. The incident is documented, but the documentation isn’t typically shared outside the unit or department.
- Level 2 — guided intervention by authority: If inappropriate behaviour is of moderate severity, or a pattern of inappropriate behaviour has emerged, the behaviour is addressed through documented confidential discussions between the respondent and someone with supervisory responsibilities at a higher level (e.g., chair/chief of division or department, vice-dean of faculty affairs, vice-dean of PGME).
- Level 3 — disciplinary interventions: If there’s no change in behaviour, there’s concern about the quality of patient care and clinical services, or there has been an egregious unprofessional act, a formal investigation process is launched. This formal process may have legal implications (see Section 7 in the Policy on Professionalism for more information).
Decision communicated
The actions to be taken are discussed with the appropriate parties, and confidentiality is maintained. Often, the reporter won’t learn about the specific outcome of the investigation but will be informed that the investigation has been completed and action has been taken (if they didn’t submit the report anonymously). There is no appeal process for the reporter.