The paper examines the challenges facing contemporary development discourse, including declining public support for foreign aid in the Global North and growing criticism of traditional development models. While some critics view development as a continuation of neocolonial power structures, others question the relevance of the broader narratives that have historically shaped international development.
Jalil proposes metamodernism as a framework for reimagining international development, one that seeks to move beyond both the optimism and certainty associated with modernism and the skepticism and cynicism often associated with postmodernism. Rather than abandoning the pursuit of progress, this approach encourages a more nuanced vision of development grounded in hope, critical reflection and practical action.
The paper explores how key metamodernist principles—including epistemic flexibility, pluriversalism, pragmatic idealism and oscillation—could help reshape development thinking. Through illustrative themes such as gender, evaluation and climate change, Jalil considers how these principles can support approaches that recognize diverse perspectives while remaining committed to addressing complex global challenges.
By encouraging a more inclusive and reflective understanding of progress, the publication contributes to ongoing discussions about how international development can respond to contemporary realities and foster meaningful solutions.
Jalil’s work reflects the Faculty of Social Sciences’ commitment to research that challenges established assumptions, engages with pressing global issues and explores new perspectives on building a more equitable and sustainable future.