Hearing at the Supreme Court of Canada: Haaretz.com et al v Mitchell Goldhar poster

Presentation

Join your fellow students and professors at the Supreme Court of Canada to watch the Haaretz.com, et al v. Mitchell Goldhar case. This is a case that seeks to determine the jurisdictional limits of internet libel, and which examines how the principle of forum non conveniens applies. (See below for complete case summary.)
Proper attire is required at the Supreme Court of Canada.

Hearing - 9:00 AM - Supreme Court of Canada

Debrief / Panel discussion - 4:00 PM

Following the trial, we will host a discussion with CLTS faculty members, lawyers, and the CIPPIC team that will be intervening at the SCC. The specific details regarding the discussion will be communicated to participants.
Speakers: Jeremy de Beer, Marina Pavlovic, David Fewer, CIPPIC lawyers as well as lawyers for the parties, including Paul Schabas, Treasurer for the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Haaretz.com, et alv. Mitchell Goldhar

The applicant Haaretz, Israel’s oldest daily newspaper, published an article criticizing the management style and business practices of the respondent Mitchell Goldhar. Mr. Goldhar is a Canadian businessman who owns Maccabi Tel Aviv Football Club, a soccer team based in Tel Aviv. The article was available in print and on the newspaper’s Hebrew and English-language websites. Mr. Goldhar commenced a defamation action in Ontario against the newspaper, its former sports editor and the author of the article alleged to be defamatory. Haaretz moved to stay the action, arguing that Ontario courts lack jurisdiction simpliciter or, alternatively, that Israel is a clearly more appropriate forum. See more on the SCC’s website.
Accessibility
If you require accommodation, please contact the event host as soon as possible.
Date and time
Nov 27, 2017
9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Format and location
In person
Fauteux Hall (FTX), room 147
57 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, ON
Language
English
Audience
General public