Govern the interaction between the Faculty, its faculty members, staff, students, trainees and Industry representatives.

Guidelines for Appropriate Use of the Internet, Electronic Networking and Other Media

These guidelines apply to all medical trainees registered at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa, including undergraduate students, graduate students, postgraduate students, postdoctoral fellows, clinical fellows, clinical research fellows, or equivalent. Use of the Internet includes posting on blogs, instant messaging (IM), social networking sites, e-mail, posting to public media sites, mailing lists and video-sites.

The capacity to record, store and transmit information in electronic format brings new responsibilities to those working in healthcare with respect to privacy of patient information and ensuring public trust in our hospitals, institutions and practices. Significant educational benefits can be derived from this technology but trainees need to be aware that there are also potential problems and liabilities associated with its use. Material that identifies patients, institutions or colleagues and is intentionally or unintentionally placed in the public domain may constitute a breach of standards of professionalism and confidentiality that damages the profession and our institutions. Guidance for medical trainees and the profession in the appropriate use of the Internet and electronic publication is necessary to avoid problems while maintaining freedom of expression.

Postgraduate trainees are reminded that they must meet multiple obligations in their capacity as university students, as members of the profession and College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), and as employees of hospitals and other institutions. These obligations extend to the use of the Internet at any time – whether in a private or public forum.

Undergraduate medical students are reminded that they must meet multiple obligations in their capacity as university students and as future members of the profession. These obligations extend to the use of the Internet at any time – whether in a private or public forum. These guidelines were developed by reference to existing standards and policies as set out in the Regulated Health Professions Act, the Medicine Act and Regulations, CPSO The Practice Guide: Medical Professionalism and College Policies, September 2007, Faculty of Medicine Standards of Ethical and Professional Behaviour, and the Core Values of professionalism, University of Ottawa.

Medical trainees are also subject to the Personal Health Information and Privacy Act as “health information custodians” of “personal health information” about individuals.

These guidelines are based on several foundational principles as follows:

  • Patient privacy and confidentiality must be maintained at all times;
  • An obligation exists to maintain the privacy and security of patient records under The Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA), which defines a record as: “information in any form or any medium, whether in written, printed, photographic or electronic form or otherwise;”
  • The content and tone of all electronic communications must remain respectful and professional;
  • Material published on the Web should be considered permanent and public;
  • Bloggers are personally responsible for the content of their blogs.
  • Never post personal health information about an individual patient.
  • Personal health information has been defined in the PHIPA as any information about an individual in oral or recorded form, where the information “identifies an individual or for which it is reasonably foreseeable in the circumstances that it could be utilized, either alone or with other information, to identify an individual”.
  • These guidelines apply even if the individual patient is the only person who may be able to identify him or herself on the basis of the posted description. Trainees should ensure that anonymized descriptions do not contain information that will enable any person, including people who have access to other sources of information about a patient, to identify the individuals described.
  • with the express consent of the patient or substitute decision-maker;
  • within secure internal hospital networks if expressly approved by the hospital or institution. Please refer to the specific internal policies of your hospital or institution;
  • within specific secure course-based environments that have been set up by the University of Ottawa and that are password-protected or have otherwise been made secure (even within these course-based environments, participants should “anonymize” individuals);
  • when no patient identifiers are associated with materials presented; and
  • when factual rather than judgmental language is used to describe patient behaviour. All events involving a patient should be described as objectively as possible, e.g., describe a hostile person by simply stating the facts, such as what they said or did and surrounding circumstances or response of staff, without using derogatory or judgmental language.
  • entirely fictionalized accounts that are so labeled.
  • Respect for the privacy rights of colleagues and co-workers is important in an inter-professional working environment.
  • If you are in doubt about whether it is appropriate to post any information about colleagues and co-workers, ask for their explicit permission – preferably in writing.
  • Making demeaning or insulting comments about colleagues and co-workers to third parties is unprofessional behaviour.
  • Respect for colleagues and co-workers is important in an inter-professional working environment.
  • Addressing colleagues and co-workers in a manner that is insulting, abusive or demeaning is unprofessional behaviour.
  • Comply with the current hospital or institutional policies with respect to the conditions of use of technology and of any proprietary information such as logos or mastheads.
  • Medical trainees must not represent or imply that they are expressing the opinion of the organization.
  • Be aware of the need for a hospital, other institution and the University to maintain the public trust.
  • Consult with the appropriate resources such as the Public Relations Department of the hospital, Postgraduate or Undergraduate Medical Education Office, or institution who can provide advice in reference to material posted on the Web that might identify the institution.

The penalties for inappropriate use of the Internet include:

  • Remediation, dismissal or failure to promote by the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa.
  • Prosecution or a lawsuit for damages for a contravention of the PHIPA.
  • A finding of professional misconduct by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (residents only).

All professionals have a collective professional duty to assure appropriate behaviour, particularly in matters of privacy and confidentiality.

A person who has reason to believe that another person has contravened these guidelines should approach his/her immediate Supervisor/Program Director for advice. If the issue is inadequately addressed, he/she may complain in writing to the appropriate Vice-Dean, Medical Education or to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario through designated processes.

Complaints about breaches of privacy may be filed with the Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario.

Senate Reference 09:M05:33 Approved: November 30, 2009

Interactions between the Faculty of Medicine and the Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, Medical Device, and Hospital and Research Equipment and Supplies Industries – Policy

Effective date: September 2011; revision date: January 2013

This document establishes the Faculty of Medicine’s principles that govern the interaction between the Faculty, its faculty members, staff, students, trainees and Industry representatives in order to assure that their interactions result in optimal benefit to clinical care, education and research, and maintenance of the public trust in health care.

This Policy applies to Faculty members, support staff, students and trainees of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa. Industry representatives are also expected to adhere to this Policy in its interactions with the Faculty.

This Policy replaces the 2008 Faculty of Medicine Policy statement on “Interacting with Industry and outside Agencies in a Teaching Environment”.

For the purposes of this Policy,

  1. Conflict of Interest (COI) may be actual, potential or perceived. A conflict of interest occurs when an individual has a significant financial, professional or other personal consideration with Industry that may compromise, or have the potential to compromise or the appearance of compromising, their professional judgment or integrity in clinical responsibilities, teaching, conducting or reporting research, or performing other obligations.

Faculty members include, but are not limited to, members of APUO, scientists, clinicians with academic appointments whether paid or volunteer and clinicians with administrative appointments including Dean, Vice-Deans, Associate and Assistant Deans, Program Directors and Department Heads.

Industry shall refer to for-profit enterprises, including: pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical services, medical device, hospital and research equipment and supplies industries and businesses and those organizations which provide research and educational support for the above industries, such as medical communications companies; and including those related not-for-profit enterprises affiliated with a for-profit enterprise (such as industry or trade associations).

Gift refers to items of any value given by Industry to Faculty members, support staff, students and trainees for personal use and for which the recipient neither pays nor provides services. This includes, but is not limited to, items such as pens, notepads, textbooks, electronic media, food and meals, gift certificates, tickets, devices, products or services, travel, hotel accommodations, entertainment or payments for attending a meeting.

The mission statement of the Faculty is as follows: “We explore, we learn, we care”. To accomplish this mission, the Faculty strives to develop, deliver and evaluate high quality educational programs; to conduct research and other scholarly enquiry into the basic and applied medical sciences; to plan for the development and delivery of health care services; and to help improve health status and service delivery to the Province of Ontario and the wider community. These activities may sometimes benefit from interaction with Industry representatives in a manner that advances the use of the best available evidence, so that medical advances and new technologies become broadly and appropriately used. The Faculty undertook in its Standards of Ethical and Professional Behaviour, adopted 1994, “to uphold the highest standards of ethical and professional behaviour in regard to Industry”.

It is recognized that there are many positive developments resulting from academic and industrial collaboration including new drugs, devices and procedures which ultimately leads to the improved health of people in our community. Interactions between the Faculty, its faculty members, support staff, students, trainees and Industry occur in a variety of contexts, including marketing of new pharmaceutical products, medical devices and/or equipment; on-site training for newly purchased devices; educational support of medical students and trainees, and continuing medical education; and research activities. Faculty members, support staff, students and trainees also participate in interactions with Industry off-campus and in scholarly publications. While the interaction with Industry can be beneficial, these interactions must be ethical and avoid Conflict of Interest situations that could lead to increased costs of healthcare, compromise of patient safety, bias, or affect the integrity of the Faculty’s education, training and research programs, or the reputation of either the faculty member, the Faculty or the University and its affiliated hospitals. Provision of direct and/or personal financial support or Gifts, even in modest amounts, can exert a subtle but measurable impact on a recipient’s behaviour.

It is the policy of the Faculty that clinical decision-making, education, and research activities are free from influence or perceived influence created by improper relationships with Industry or by the receipt of Gifts. The principles outlined in this policy shall guide all potential relationships or interactions between Industry and the Faculty, its faculty members, support staff, students and trainees.

This Policy covers the following:

  1. Gifts, Meals and Compensation
  2. Drug and Device Samples
  3. Access by Industry Representatives to Faculty, Staff, Students and Trainees
  4. Industry Support for Educational Programs
  5. Industry-Sponsored Scholarships or Other Educational Funds for Students and Trainees
  6. Off-Campus Industry-Sponsored Meetings or Activities
  7. Industry Support for Research
  8. Disclosure of Relationships with Industry
  9. Training
  10. Reporting of Non-compliance
  11.  Appeal to Sanctions

5.1(a) Gifts

The uOttawa Faculty of Medicine’s members, support staff, students, and trainees shall not accept Gifts for personal use from Industry representatives, regardless of the nature or value of the gift. Gifts of educational materials directed at physicians or patients are permitted only if appropriate materials are not available from a public source (e.g., government agency, foundation, or disease-related association) or commercially available and are PAAB (Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board) approved. This restriction also applies to product information that Industry representatives leave in or outside the room for participants to pick up after rounds. It also applies to collections of peer-reviewed scientific articles, since such collections may be highly selective and not representative of the literature. Institutional gifts including, but not limited to, donations, grants, in-kind support, and other materials may be accepted by the Faculty, its Offices, Divisions, Departments and
Research Institutes provided appropriate documentation and public disclosure occurs.

5.1(b) Meals

Meals or other hospitality provided to individuals that are directly funded by Industry (i.e. paid for by industry or their representative) may not be offered in any facility occupied and operated by the Faculty or owned by the University. This includes, but is not limited to, coffee, snacks, lunches or dinners. Faculty members and support staff should apply this principle when participating in any off-campus events solely sponsored by Industry which may or may not include meals. Specifically, faculty members and staff shall not facilitate or condone the attendance of medical or graduate students or trainees at off campus events solely sponsored by Industry which may or may not include meals. Medical students or trainees (but not graduate students) should only participate in off campus medical educational events that are accredited by a recognized College or Society (i.e. meals and hospitality provided by the physician organization sponsoring the event, not industry directly).

5.1(c) Compensation

Compensation in exchange for listening to a sales talk or attending a continuing medical education session or other activity in which the attendee has no other role is not permitted.

  • 5.1.1 Arrangements with Industry whereby faculty, support staff, students or trainees are guaranteed the payment of an amount or other benefit without any duties (such as participation on scientific advisory boards that do not regularly meet and provide scientific advice) are considered Gifts and are not permitted. In order to avoid Gifts disguised as consulting contracts, speaking engagements or other arrangement for services, a contract should be signed by the faculty member prior to the event which provides specific tasks and deliverables with payment commensurate with such tasks and deliverables. This contract should be retained on file by the faculty member and disclosed as part of the member’s annual “Conflict of Interest” disclosure to the Office of Professional Affairs or reappointment review as indicated in section 5.7.4. Faculty members may accept appropriate compensation from Industry for work done (i.e. consultation and peer-training) at a rate up to that which is commensurate with their clinical/academic remuneration. Faculty members should not participate in speakers bureaus for specific companies.
  • 5.1.2 The Faculty may, subject to applicable collective agreements, require faculty members and support staff to change the terms of consulting agreements or request use of a standard contract template to ensure compliance with this Policy. If the terms cannot be followed, the Faculty may withhold its approval of such consulting activities.
  • 5.2.1 The Faculty views the provision by Industry manufacturers of “free” samples, for example, of prescription drug or device products as a marketing practice designed to promote the use of these products and to gain access to prescribing professionals in an attempt to influence their behaviour. At the same time, the Faculty recognizes that this practice can assist some patients to quickly begin a course of treatment or to determine which therapeutic option is most beneficial for that patient. While societal benefits may result from the availability of medications at the point of care, provision of samples is also accompanied by regulatory and security concerns, poses potential safety risks for patients, and encourages prescribing of new, high cost medications whose safety and efficacy may not be different from existing treatments. In this context, faculty members, support staff, students and trainees should utilize pharmaceutical or device samples only within the policies and procedures established by the affiliated healthcare facility and relevant provincial health authorities. In general, samples should be provided to a central bureau, e.g., ideally a hospital dispensary or organized clinic and not to individual faculty members or trainees. The clinic note should document the use of free samples and the reason for their use. The Faculty also recognizes that the contribution of these samples may be a valid in-kind contribution to a research program seeking peer-reviewed third party funding.
  • 5.2.2 Drug samples and reagents provided to laboratories for research purposes may be accepted provided there is clear documentation regarding the source and disposition of the samples/reagents.
  • 5.3.1 Faculty members, support staff, students and trainees in the clinical setting or at health care facilities associated with the Faculty must abide by the policies and procedures established by such facilities and/or relevant provincial health authorities with regard to meeting with Industry representatives. In general, Industry representatives are permitted in non-patient care areas only by appointment. They may attend meetings or rounds only if permission has been granted by the health care facility, Department Head or delegated Division Head, and they have signed an agreement which prohibits their participation in discussions. Industry representatives are not permitted in patient care areas except to provide in-service training on devices or other equipment as requested by the health care facility, Department Head or delegated Division Head, and then only by appointment and, if applicable, with appropriate consent by the patient or surrogate. Documentation of permission must be retained by the health care facility, Department Head or delegated Division Head. Industry representatives should not be able to pay for access to clinical areas under any circumstance. Industry representatives are prohibited from having any direct interactions with medical students unless they are supervised by a faculty member. However, independent interactions between resident trainees or graduate students and Industry representatives may be acceptable if their supervisor feels the interactions are appropriate for the level of training and the trainee/graduate student understands the principles of the “Interactions with Industry” policy.
  • 5.3.2 Commercial exhibits intended to showcase Industry products are not permitted on Faculty of Medicine premises unless specifically authorized by the Dean’s Office and may only be allowed elsewhere if they are directly related to an educational activity, and must comply with the Office of Continuing Medical Education’s “Policy on Continuing Medical Education and Industry”. Industry representatives may be permitted to demonstrate products/devices as part of education programs only when deemed necessary by the program committee organizing the event.
  • 5.4.1 When accepted by the Faculty, Industry support for educational programs must be free of Conflict of Interest and must be provided in the form of an education grant. Funds that are provided by educational groups or other entities that act as “intermediaries” for Industry (i.e. medical communications companies) must also be provided as education grants.
  • 5.4.2 Funds from Industry for undergraduate medical educational activities may be provided to the Faculty through the Undergraduate Education Office, but must not be given directly to a faculty member, staff, student or trainee. Education grants may cover expenses including, but not limited to, venue costs, speaker expenses and honoraria, modest food and beverages that are determined by the Undergraduate Education Office to be important for the program.
  • 5.4.3 Funds from Industry for postgraduate medical educational activities may be provided to the Faculty, to a Department or Division within the Faculty, but must not be given directly to a faculty member, staff, student or trainee. Education grants may cover expenses including, but not limited, to venue costs, speaker expenses and honoraria, modest food and beverages that are determined by the Department or Division to be important for the program.
  • 5.4.4 Funds for continuing medical education activities may be provided by Industry in the form of an education grant to the Faculty of Medicine, to an individual Department or to the Office of Continuing Medical Education (“OCME”), but must not be given directly to an individual faculty member, staff, student or trainee. Education grants may cover expenses including, but not limited, to venue costs, speaker expenses and honoraria, modest food and beverages that are determined by the planning committee to be important for the program. Ideally, registration fees should be charged for education events for physicians which should reduce the funding needed from Industry. OCME must accredit all Industry-funded CME programs using the University or Faculty name or logos (except for rounds and journal clubs), and budgets for these programs must be registered with OCME. Agreements governing grants supporting educational events must receive prior approval by the Office of Continuing Medical Education. Industry funding should be acknowledged using company namesand logos only (no trade names of drugs or devices) on brochures and programs.
  • 5.4.5 The content of all continuing educational programs must be independently determined by the Faculty program planning group consisting of physicians and healthcare professionals representing the target audience. Industry sponsors of educational programs or their representatives may not determine the content or selection of speakers for educational programs nor participate in such decisions, and in the case of CME activities, the organization of events must comply with policies of the OCME and meet accreditation standards of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons and/or the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
  • 5.5.1 Direct use of industry funds, in which the industry can be identified, to support students and trainees to attend conferences or off-campus courses is not acceptable
  • 5.5.2 Industry support for scholarships and academic prizes must be free of any real or perceived Conflict of Interest, and must comply with the following requirements:
  1. The Faculty of Medicine’s Department or Division must select the student(s) or trainee(s) for participation or for receipt of prizes or awards at ceremonies and convocation;
  2. Such prizes must be named for the achievements they recognize and not for the Industry that provided the funds, although the accompanying citations may identify the Industry organization;
  3. The funds must be provided to the Department or Division and not directly to the student or trainee;
  4. The presentation of the award must be made by a representative of the Department, not of Industry;
  5. There is no implicit or explicit expectation that the recipient must provide something in return for receipt of the award.
  • 5.6.1 Faculty members, support staff, medical or graduate students and trainees may only participate in off-campus meetings or conferences developed by physician or scientific society/organizations which receive Industry support or funding (including, but not limited to, lecturing, organizing the meeting or moderating sessions), if they abide by the following requirements:
  1. Any financial support is fully disclosed to participants by the meeting sponsor;
  2. The content and funding of the meeting or session must be under the control of the physician or scientific society/organization (see sections 5.4.4 and 5.4.5);
  3. The speaker(s) must provide a fair and balanced discussion of the current science and treatment options;
  4. The speaker(s) must make clear that the content and comments reflect the individual views of the speaker(s) and not the Faculty;
  5. Compensation is reasonable and limited to reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses and an honorarium proportional to the defined service and should be payable by the meeting’s organization or society and not Industry directly.
  • 5.6.2 Faculty members and support staff may participate in industry sponsored meetings pertaining to the evaluation of materials including but not limited to new equipment and products as part of an institutional procurement process provided they follow the institution’s (university, hospital, research institute) policies regarding procurement of such materials.
  • 5.7.1 A prerequisite for the participation of faculty members, staff, students and trainees in any research activity is that these activities are ethically conducted, socially responsible and scientifically valid.
  • 5.7.2 All faculty members, staff, students and trainees who participate in the design, conduct of analysis or reporting of Industry-funded or industry co-sponsored research which is based at the University shall ensure that the budget includes all applicable overhead costs and that there is a signed multi-partner agreement that is satisfactory to the researcher, the Head of the Department in which the researcher holds his/her primary appointment, and the Industry partner. In the case of research conducted at affiliated institutions (i.e. the contract will be administered outside the university) research projects involving Industry must comply with the policies and procedures of the affiliated institution. These policies and procedures must be agreed to by the University. Those research projects involving the participation of human subjects or the use of their data must be also be approved by the University’s or the Hospital’s Research Ethics Board.
  • 5.7.3 Research grants from, or contracts with Industry should not be accepted or utilized to support research unless it is carried out independently and objectively for the purposes of the advancement of scientific knowledge or clinical efficacy. Faculty members, staff, student and trainee shall not enter into research agreements with Industry that limit their right to publish or disclose results of the study or report adverse events that occur during the course of the study. The Faculty recognizes that as part of a formal research contract between the institution and Industry that there may be publication review or limited delays to enable the filing of intellectual property protection.
  • 5.7.4 Because of the potential to influence judgment, remuneration for participating in Industry-funded research studies, including clinical research studies, should not constitute enticement. It may cover reasonable time and expenses and should be approved by the University’s or the Hospital’s Research Ethics Board for studies involving the participation of human subjects or the use of their data. Remuneration should be disclosed in the annual “Conflict of Interest”, or re-appointment review. Finder’s fees, whereby the sole activity performed by the faculty or staff member is to submit the names of potential research subjects, are not acceptable.
  • 5.7.5 All research funding received from Industry will be administered through special purpose project-specific research accounts at the University or at an affiliated institute, centre or teaching hospital. Statements disclosing all expenditures, transfers and transactions from these accounts will be provided to Department Heads on an annual basis.
  • 5.8.1 On an annual basis, faculty members and staff will disclose, in writing, relationships with Industry to the Faculty of Medicine’s Office of Professional Affairs. Disclosures will be reviewed and if a significant unmanaged conflict of interest is identified, then the disclosure will be forwarded to Department heads or supervisors. The written disclosure must specify nature of the relationship with Industry, the work performed and total amount and type of compensation or other benefit received. Similarly, faculty members and staff will verify annually that their reporting was accurate and complete. Management of unresolved conflicts of interest will be done in collaboration between the faculty member, the Office of Professional Affairs’ Conflict of Interest Resolution Committee, the Department head and/or supervisor.

NOTE: TOH staff may provide disclosure through the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute provided they approve of its access by the Office of Professional Affairs.

  • 5.8.2 Prior to any educational activity such as lectures, seminars or workshops, faculty members, staff or speaker must disclose to the learning audience whether or not the faculty member or staff believes he or she has any relevant Conflict of Interest or other interest with Industry. If the faculty member, staff or speaker has a Conflict of Interest or any other interest with Industry, the disclosure must be contained in their written presentation materials. The disclosure must include the name of the individual, the nature of the interest and the relationship between the faculty member or staff and Industry or the interest in Industry. Information that an individual has no relevant financial relationship must also be disclosed in advance to the learning audience.
  • 5.8.3 Faculty members or staff with supervisory responsibilities must disclose any Conflict(s) of Interest (as outlined in section 5.8.1) to students or trainees or staff under their supervision and must ensure that the faculty or staff's Conflict of Interest does not affect or appear to affect his or her supervision of the student, trainee, or staff member.
  • 5.8.4 Faculty members, staff, students and trainees are prohibited from publishing articles or presentations or producing other forms of media under their names (ghost writing) that are written in whole or in part by Industry representatives. In scholarly publications, individuals must disclose their related financial interests in accordance with the requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
  • 5.8.5 Faculty members, staff, students and trainees having a direct role in making decisions on equipment or drug procurement must disclose to the purchasing unit, prior to making any such decision, any Conflict of Interest that they or their immediate family have in companies that might substantially benefit from the decision. Such relationships could include equity ownership (excluding indirect ownership such as stock held through mutual funds), compensated positions on advisory boards, a paid consultancy, or other forms of compensated relationship. They must also disclose any research or educational interest they or their department have that might substantially benefit from the decision. The purchasing unit will decide whether the individual must excuse him/herself from the purchasing decision.
  • 5.8.6 Faculty members with positions of influence or fiduciary responsibilities in an Industry should not participate in human subject research on a technology or product owned by or obligated to the Industry unless specifically disclosed and approved by a Hospital/Institutional Research Ethics Board. Faculty members leading research involving human subjects must inform participants that the researcher will, or will not, receive a fee for their participation and by whom the fee will be paid. In addition, individuals may not conduct research with human subjects if they or their immediate family have a significant financial interest in an existing or potential product or a company that could be affected by the outcome of the research.
  • 5.9.1 Faculty members, staff, students and trainees shall receive awareness training regarding interactions with Industry. The Faculty will develop appropriate educational materials and methods, and each Department within the Faculty will oversee such training and its quality.
  • 5.10.1 Faculty members, staff, students or trainees who are aware of contraventions of this Policy should report such breaches to the Department Head or to the Vice Dean of Professional Affairs. Violations of these policies by Industry representatives will be managed through progressive warnings and restrictions on access to Faculty personnel, facilities and events.
  • 5.10.2 Subject to the provisions of applicable collective agreements, suspected breaches of this Policy shall be referred to the individual’s immediate supervisor and Department Head or equivalent, who shall determine what actions, if any, shall be taken. Depending upon the seriousness of the breach, whether the breach is a first or repeat occurrence and whether the individual knowingly breached the policy or attempted to conceal the breach, breaches of this policy may result in the imposition of sanctions and measures. The handling of breaches of this Policy and the imposition of sanctions and measures may be subject to applicable collective provisions, may depend on other University policies and may require the approval of other authorities at the University. The following list provides examples of sanctions or other measures and is not meant to be exhaustive nor necessarily represents a progression of sanctions or measures:
  1. Counselling, educational sessions on Conflict of Interest for the individual involved;
  2. Employment-related disciplinary measures, such as a reprimand, removal of supervisory duties, suspension or dismissal;
  3. Academic-related measures, such as suspension or expulsion;
  4. Banning the individual from any further outside engagements for a period of time;
  5. Requiring that the individual return any monies received from the relationship with Industry in contravention of this Policy.
  • 5.11.1 A sanction must be discussed between the Faculty member, the Division Chief, Department Chair and the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine according to which level of administration levied the sanction. A faculty member has the right to appeal a sanction levied by their Division, Department or Faculty of Medicine. The first level of appeal is for the Faculty member to present their case before the next level of administration which levied the sanction. If the Faculty Member still has issues with the sanction, he/she may present their case to the Professionalism Disciplinary Committee for arbitration between the Faculty Member and respective level of administration. If unsuccessful, the faculty member may appeal before the Faculty Council and the resulting decision will be considered final within the Faculty of Medicine.

This Policy will be reviewed every three (3) years.

Committee Date
Faculty Advisory Board January 29, 2013
Faculty Council February 27, 2013
Executive Committee of the Senate May 21, 2013 (13:M05:07)
  • Association of American Medical Colleges. “Industry Funding of Medical Education: Report of an AAMC Task Force” (April 2008; approved by AFMC 2009)
  • Canadian Medical Association “Guidelines for Physicians in Interactions with Industry” (2007)
  • College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. The Practice Guide: Medical Professionalism and College Policies. September 2007; Revised online 2008
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa Policy on INTERACTING WITH INDUSTRY AND OUTSIDE AGENCIES in a teaching environment
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Standards of Ethical and Professional Behaviour, 1993.
  • Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Publications.
    • Physicians and Industry - Conflicts of Interest
    • Guidelines for approval of CPD activities developed by a physician organization
    • Guidelines for an accredited provider to co-sponsor a CPD event with a non-physician organization
    • Guidelines for Support of Continuing Medical Education by Industry
  • The Ottawa Hospital
    • Corporate Policy and Procedure Manual, Policy No ADM X 220, Code of Conduct – 2006 November 24 –
    • Corporate Policy and Procedure Manual, Policy No. ADM X 260, Gifts. 2008 October 08.
  • Tri-Council Statement on Research Involving Humans

Section 1: Honoraria and expense reimbursement for Industry-sponsored Continuing Education

  1. For speaking engagements that require overnight travel, the provided honoraria shall not exceed $3,000 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts. Exceptions would require prior written approval by the head of OCME, VP Medical Affairs of the Health Care Facility, CEO or appropriate Director of the affiliated research institute, Department Head, or Division Head.
  2. For speaking engagements that do not require overnight travel, the provided honoraria shall not exceed $1,500 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts.
  3. For the development of enduring materials, the provided honoraria shall not exceed $1,500 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts.
  4. For the review of enduring materials, the provided honoraria shall not exceed $1,000 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts.
  5. Fees exceeding the above guideline must be approved in advance by the Department Head.

Section 2: Compensation for acting as a consultant to Industry

  1. Compensation for consulting work shall not exceed $3,000 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts.
  2. Fees exceeding the above guideline must be approved in advance by the Department Head.

Section 3:: Compensation for work-related to Industry-sponsored research

  1. Compensation to an investigator for administrative activities required to initiate a clinical research study (including budgeting, ethics submission, etc.) shall not exceed $1,500 per day.
  2. Compensation for attendance at a clinical investigators’ meeting shall not exceed $1,500 per day plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses documented with receipts.
  3. Payments for study-related procedures, examinations or follow-up visits required by protocol may not exceed the Ontario tariff for these services.
  4. Payments for research-related services required for the conduct of a study not covered by Ontario Health tariffs (including letters, reports, etc.) may not exceed $750 per patient per year enrolled in the study.
  5. Fees exceeding or in addition to the above guideline must be approved in advance by the Department Head.

Section 4:: Cumulative Total (or Total Annual) Compensation from Industry

  1. Where a Faculty member receives a total of more than $10,000 for services to Industry during a calendar year, the member shall inform the Department Head of the total. This should be reported prior to completing the annual conflict of interest statement or annual reappointment review.
  2. Where the total exceeds $20,000 during a calendar year, the member shall also inform the Dean.